Jump to content

NASA X-Hab 2025: Modular Robotic Construction: Difference between revisions

From Aurora Robotics
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
[[File:Nasa xhab.jpg|thumb|NASA X-Hab Logo]]
[[File:Nasa xhab.jpg|thumb|NASA X-Hab Logo]]


<p>In early 2024, NASA released a request for proposals addressing the construction of a permanent lunar base. [https://lawlor.cs.uaf.edu/~olawlor/ Dr. Orion Lawlor] led the Aurora Robotics Team's proposal in response to Appendix B of the [https://spacegrant.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/M2M-X-Hab-Challenge-Solicitation-2025.pdf NASA RFP document], sponsored by NASA's Autonomous Robotic Construction Projects - TLT, PASS, ARMADAS. The proposal outlines the development of a modular robot capable of autonomous construction on the lunar surface.</p>
<p>In 2024, [https://spacegrant.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/M2M-X-Hab-Challenge-Solicitation-2025.pdf NASA's M2M X-Hab Academic Innovation Challenge for 2025] was released, for which [[Main Page|the Aurora Robotics Lab]] at the University of Alaska Fairbanks was accepted and funded through NASA’s 2024–2025 Moon to Mars X-Hab Academic Innovation Challenge. Our goal was to explore modular robotic construction techniques for lunar infrastructure, especially focusing on micrometeoroid-resistant arch structures made from modular steel trusses and covered in lunar regolith, with a clear path to fully autonomous robotic construction.</p>
 
<p>The project culminated in the development of the [[Excahauler|Excahauler robotic platform]] with a custom-built arm and end-effector, capable of aligning and assembling scaled modular truss components. Despite limitations in time and resources, the team demonstrated capabilities including truss manipulation, partial structural testing, and scale backfilling with regolith simulant (snow).</p>
 
<p>This wiki page is a very abridged version of our [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N_494oalexJXKeGfjDocUZKAdBZPZ5RYqvyGjyIhMkg/edit?tab=t.0 full final report] which should soon be added to [https://ntrs.nasa.gov/ NASA's NTRS database].</p>


<h2>Project Vision and Mission</h2>
<h2>Project Vision and Mission</h2>
<ul>
<ul>
   <li><strong>Long-Term Vision:</strong> Transform the solar system using robotic construction with local materials.</li>
   <li><strong>Long-Term Vision:</strong> Transform the solar system using robotic construction with local materials.</li>
   <li><strong>Short-Term Vision:</strong> Robotic construction of Artemis Base Camp.</li>
   <li><strong>Short-Term Vision:</strong> Develop robotic infrastructure construction technologies for the Artemis Base Camp.</li>
   <li><strong>Mission:</strong> Design and demonstrate robots capable of autonomously constructing Artemis Base Camp structures using locally sourced Lunar regolith, focusing first on an arch-based, regolith-covered vehicle bay.</li>
   <li><strong>Mission:</strong> Design and demonstrate robotic tools and modular structures capable of assembling scalable micrometeoroid-resistant lunar shelters.</li>
</ul>
</ul>


<h2>Requirements</h2>
<h2>The L-Truss System</h2>
[[File:L-Truss.jpg|alt=The final full-steel L-Truss design.|thumb|The final full-steel L-Truss design.]]
<p>The primary structural innovation was the development of the <strong>L-Truss</strong>: A modular trapezoidal truss segment. These trusses connect via push-fit endplates and spring-loaded capture pins to form straight or curved assemblies, including arches and retaining walls. The final full-steel design used plasma-cut end plates with a 3D printed door latch-style connection. However, full robotic connection could not be demonstrated with this design, so we made some last minute changes. The final prototype design included:</p>
<ul>
<ul>
   <li>The structure must allow a 2.6m x 2.6m vehicle to fit inside. (I.0)</li>
   <li>Hybrid steel construction with 3D printed carbon-fiber polycarbonate alignment funnels.</li>
   <li>Structural elements must not exceed 2.0 meters for ease of transport. (I.1.1)</li>
   <li>Spring-loaded pin latching mechanisms for tool-free robotic assembly.</li>
   <li>The structure must support a regolith simulant (snow) coating of at least 0.2m thickness to simulate radiation and thermal protection. (O.0)</li>
   <li>Optional upright members for regolith support and buckling resistance.</li>
   <li>The structure must tolerate a compressive load of 300 kgf and demonstrate a safety factor of at least 2. (I.1.2, I.2.1)</li>
   <li>Final tested form: 1.5m long, ~3kg, with a base angle of 22..</li>
  <li>Assembly must be robotically achievable, with all tools having a path to robotic automation. (E.0, E.2)</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>A scale 3D printable version is publicly available: [https://www.printables.com/model/1305834-trapezoidal-l-truss-clip-together-construction-mod L-Truss Model]</p>


<h2>Concept of Operations</h2>
<h2>Structure Requirements</h2>
<p>The design features a Lunar Autonomous Modular Platform (LAMP) robot performing the following tasks:</p>
<ul>
<ul>
   <li>Excavation and site preparation using a bucket and grinder.</li>
   <li>Accommodate 2.6m x 2.6m vehicles within the constructed arch structure. (I.0)</li>
   <li>Logistics support via part removal and transport using a forklift attachment.</li>
  <li>Truss segments must remain under 2.0 meters for transport and robotic handling. (I.1.1)</li>
   <li>Assembly and alignment of structural components using pin-based connectors and manipulators.</li>
   <li>Regolith shielding: Support ≥0.2m regolith equivalent for radiation/thermal protection. (O.0)</li>
   <li>Backfilling with regolith simulant using robotic tools like snowblowers.</li>
   <li>Minimum compressive load capacity of 300 kgf with ≥2.0 safety factor. (I.1.2, I.2.1)</li>
   <li>Robot-compatible assembly path: all actions must have potential for automation. (E.0, E.2)</li>
</ul>
</ul>


<h2>Key Project Goals</h2>
<h2>Concept of Operations</h2>
[[File:Arch Assembly Graphic.png|alt=A graphical representation of the truss section assembly process. |thumb|A graphical representation of the truss section assembly process. This is to be done in parallel with other truss sections (i.e., ones behind the one visible) to create a full truss structure.]]
<h3>Lunar Deployment Plan</h3>
<ol>
  <li><strong>Site Preparation:</strong> The Excahauler prepares a foundation using excavation tools.</li>
  <li><strong>Truss Deployment:</strong> Trusses are unloaded from a logistics lander and staged for assembly.</li>
  <li><strong>Structural Assembly:</strong> Robots assemble the arch structure according to the graphic on the right.</li>
  <li><strong>Backfilling:</strong> Lunar regolith is put over the structure via ballistic throwing or traditional scooping.</li>
  <li><strong>Use Phase:</strong> Covered arches serve as shielding for sensitive lunar equipment or crew.</li>
</ol>
 
<h3>Ground Demonstration Activities</h3>
<ul>
<ul>
   <li><strong>Radiation Protection:</strong> Shield against harmful cosmic rays for long-duration crew stays.</li>
   <li>1:10 scale arch model tested with regolith simulant (basalt dust).</li>
   <li><strong>Thermal Insulation:</strong> Mitigate temperature swings during lunar day and night.</li>
   <li>Full-scale hybrid trusses fabricated and manipulated via teleoperation.</li>
   <li><strong>MMOD Protection:</strong> Protect from micrometeoroids and orbital debris.</li>
   <li>Robotic assembly verified using [[Excahauler]] and custom-built 2500:1 reducer gearbox arm.</li>
  <li><strong>Scalability:</strong> Demonstrate large-scale, robot-built infrastructure on the Moon.</li>
</ul>
</ul>


<h2>Project Phases</h2>
<h2>Project Phases</h2>
<ol>
<ol>
   <li><strong>Preliminary Design Review (PDR):</strong> November 15, 2024 ([https://spacegrant.org/xhab/ M2M X-Hab Schedule])</li>
  <li><strong>System Definition Review (SDR):</strong> October 4, 2024</li>
   <li><strong>Critical Design Review (CDR):</strong> January 17, 2025</li>
   <li><strong>Preliminary Design Review (PDR):</strong> November 15, 2024</li>
   <li><strong>Progress Checkpoint:</strong> March 7, 2025</li>
   <li><strong>Critical Design Review (CDR):</strong> January 24, 2025</li>
   <li><strong>Final Demonstration:</strong> May 2025</li>
   <li><strong>Progress Checkpoint Review (PCR):</strong> April 18, 2025</li>
   <li><strong>Final Report:</strong> May 23, 2025</li>
</ol>
</ol>


<h2>Baseline Design Solution</h2>
<h2>Robot System: [[Excahauler]]</h2>
<ul>
<ul>
   <li><strong>Structure:</strong> Flat truss segments for modular assembly.</li>
   <li>Originally designed for the [[Project Archives|2022 NASA Break the Ice Challenge]].</li>
   <li><strong>Materials:</strong> Durable, lightweight components pre-covered with mixed wire and cloth for ease of regolith application.</li>
   <li>Outfitted with a custom modular manipulator arm with 3D printed stepped planetary gearboxes.</li>
   <li><strong>Robot:</strong> Modular LAMP robot for excavation, assembly, and backfilling.</li>
   <li>Used in successful teleoperated tests to transport and align L-Truss segments.</li>
  <li><strong>Performance:</strong> High load-bearing capacity with a safety factor of at least 2.</li>
</ul>
</ul>


<h2>Verification and Testing</h2>
<h2>Software and Simulation</h2>
[[File:X-Hab LUNATIC Software Stack.png|alt=The modified LUNATIC software stack for the X-Hab 2025 project; adds support for the truss manipulator arm.|thumb|The modified LUNATIC software stack for the X-Hab 2025 project; adds support for the truss manipulator arm.]]
<p>The team developed and tested robotic workflows using the following tools:</p>
<ul>
<ul>
   <li>Destructive and nondestructive compressive load tests.</li>
   <li><strong>[[LUMINSim|Godot-based simulator:]]</strong> Visualized structure assembly and layout.</li>
   <li>Full-scale assembly and snow load testing in a controlled environment.</li>
   <li><strong>[https://github.com/auroraRoboticsLab/MiningRobot?tab=readme-ov-file#lunatic Custom autonomy stack (LUNATIC):]</strong> Handles teleoperation, control, and vision.</li>
   <li>Robot alignment and assembly demonstration in a lab setting.</li>
  <li><strong>[https://docs.ros.org/en/humble/index.html ROS2] / [https://moveit.picknik.ai/main/index.html MoveIt]:</strong> Inverse kinematics modeled, full integration for automation incomplete.</li>
</ul>
 
<h2>Testing and Validation</h2>
<ul>
  <li>FEM analysis showed safety factor >2.6 under 500N compressive loads.</li>
  <li>Hybrid trusses withstood >500N axial loads; failure occurred at 230N in bending.</li>
   <li>1/10 scale arch supported >12kg in Earth gravity, equivalent to 36+ tonnes in Mars gravity at full scale.</li>
</ul>
</ul>


<h2>Educational Integration</h2>
<h2>Educational Integration</h2>
<p>The project integrates into UAF's curriculum, offering hands-on systems design and testing opportunities for engineering students.</p>
<p>Project integrated into UAF's CS 493 (Fall) and CS 454 (Spring), providing hands-on systems engineering experience to undergraduates and graduate students in mechanical and computer science disciplines.</p>
 
<h2>Outreach Activities</h2>
<ul>
  <li><strong>UAF Party in the Park:</strong> Public engagement event with live robot demos.</li>
  <li><strong>FTC Robotics Tours:</strong> Guided tour for K–12 robotics students.</li>
  <li><strong>UAF Engineering Open House:</strong> Structural demo and recruiting opportunity.</li>
</ul>
 
<h2>Lessons Learned</h2>We were not able to complete our promised deliverables to full satisfaction due to time constraints and lack of defined leadership structure. We learned important lessons about:<ul>
  <li><strong>Structure:</strong> Even small teams benefit from defined leadership and task ownership.</li>
  <li><strong>Planning:</strong> Conservative scoping ensures project deliverables can be met.</li>
  <li><strong>Fabrication:</strong> Early design-for-manufacturing saves time and enables iteration.</li>
</ul>
 
<h2>Future Work</h2>
<ul>
  <li>Complete full-scale robotic arch assembly.</li>
  <li>Fully integrate MoveIt into robotic control stack for autonomous alignment.</li>
  <li>Refine end-effector precision and truss fabrication for large-scale repeatability.</li>
</ul>


<h2>Additional Information</h2>
<h2>Additional Information</h2>
<p>For more details, please contact Dr. Orion Lawlor at oslawlor@alaska.edu or visit the [https://spacegrant.org/xhab/ NASA X-Hab Challenge website].</p>
 
* Project Lead: [[User:Acmattson3|Andrew Mattson]], UAF CS BS/MS student
* Faculty Advisor: [[User:Lawlor|Dr. Orion Lawlor]] (oslawlor@alaska.edu)
* Team Members:
** [[User:Frozenstiff|Elliott Madsen]] (ME BS)
** Delano Horner (ME BS)
** Daniel Schliesing (ME BS)
** Kory Lamme (ME BS)

Latest revision as of 13:13, 7 July 2025

This is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

Overview

NASA X-Hab Logo

In 2024, NASA's M2M X-Hab Academic Innovation Challenge for 2025 was released, for which the Aurora Robotics Lab at the University of Alaska Fairbanks was accepted and funded through NASA’s 2024–2025 Moon to Mars X-Hab Academic Innovation Challenge. Our goal was to explore modular robotic construction techniques for lunar infrastructure, especially focusing on micrometeoroid-resistant arch structures made from modular steel trusses and covered in lunar regolith, with a clear path to fully autonomous robotic construction.

The project culminated in the development of the Excahauler robotic platform with a custom-built arm and end-effector, capable of aligning and assembling scaled modular truss components. Despite limitations in time and resources, the team demonstrated capabilities including truss manipulation, partial structural testing, and scale backfilling with regolith simulant (snow).

This wiki page is a very abridged version of our full final report which should soon be added to NASA's NTRS database.

Project Vision and Mission

  • Long-Term Vision: Transform the solar system using robotic construction with local materials.
  • Short-Term Vision: Develop robotic infrastructure construction technologies for the Artemis Base Camp.
  • Mission: Design and demonstrate robotic tools and modular structures capable of assembling scalable micrometeoroid-resistant lunar shelters.

The L-Truss System

The final full-steel L-Truss design.
The final full-steel L-Truss design.

The primary structural innovation was the development of the L-Truss: A modular trapezoidal truss segment. These trusses connect via push-fit endplates and spring-loaded capture pins to form straight or curved assemblies, including arches and retaining walls. The final full-steel design used plasma-cut end plates with a 3D printed door latch-style connection. However, full robotic connection could not be demonstrated with this design, so we made some last minute changes. The final prototype design included:

  • Hybrid steel construction with 3D printed carbon-fiber polycarbonate alignment funnels.
  • Spring-loaded pin latching mechanisms for tool-free robotic assembly.
  • Optional upright members for regolith support and buckling resistance.
  • Final tested form: 1.5m long, ~3kg, with a base angle of 22.5°.

A scale 3D printable version is publicly available: L-Truss Model

Structure Requirements

  • Accommodate 2.6m x 2.6m vehicles within the constructed arch structure. (I.0)
  • Truss segments must remain under 2.0 meters for transport and robotic handling. (I.1.1)
  • Regolith shielding: Support ≥0.2m regolith equivalent for radiation/thermal protection. (O.0)
  • Minimum compressive load capacity of 300 kgf with ≥2.0 safety factor. (I.1.2, I.2.1)
  • Robot-compatible assembly path: all actions must have potential for automation. (E.0, E.2)

Concept of Operations

A graphical representation of the truss section assembly process.
A graphical representation of the truss section assembly process. This is to be done in parallel with other truss sections (i.e., ones behind the one visible) to create a full truss structure.

Lunar Deployment Plan

  1. Site Preparation: The Excahauler prepares a foundation using excavation tools.
  2. Truss Deployment: Trusses are unloaded from a logistics lander and staged for assembly.
  3. Structural Assembly: Robots assemble the arch structure according to the graphic on the right.
  4. Backfilling: Lunar regolith is put over the structure via ballistic throwing or traditional scooping.
  5. Use Phase: Covered arches serve as shielding for sensitive lunar equipment or crew.

Ground Demonstration Activities

  • 1:10 scale arch model tested with regolith simulant (basalt dust).
  • Full-scale hybrid trusses fabricated and manipulated via teleoperation.
  • Robotic assembly verified using Excahauler and custom-built 2500:1 reducer gearbox arm.

Project Phases

  1. System Definition Review (SDR): October 4, 2024
  2. Preliminary Design Review (PDR): November 15, 2024
  3. Critical Design Review (CDR): January 24, 2025
  4. Progress Checkpoint Review (PCR): April 18, 2025
  5. Final Report: May 23, 2025

Robot System: Excahauler

  • Originally designed for the 2022 NASA Break the Ice Challenge.
  • Outfitted with a custom modular manipulator arm with 3D printed stepped planetary gearboxes.
  • Used in successful teleoperated tests to transport and align L-Truss segments.

Software and Simulation

The modified LUNATIC software stack for the X-Hab 2025 project; adds support for the truss manipulator arm.
The modified LUNATIC software stack for the X-Hab 2025 project; adds support for the truss manipulator arm.

The team developed and tested robotic workflows using the following tools:

Testing and Validation

  • FEM analysis showed safety factor >2.6 under 500N compressive loads.
  • Hybrid trusses withstood >500N axial loads; failure occurred at 230N in bending.
  • 1/10 scale arch supported >12kg in Earth gravity, equivalent to 36+ tonnes in Mars gravity at full scale.

Educational Integration

Project integrated into UAF's CS 493 (Fall) and CS 454 (Spring), providing hands-on systems engineering experience to undergraduates and graduate students in mechanical and computer science disciplines.

Outreach Activities

  • UAF Party in the Park: Public engagement event with live robot demos.
  • FTC Robotics Tours: Guided tour for K–12 robotics students.
  • UAF Engineering Open House: Structural demo and recruiting opportunity.

Lessons Learned

We were not able to complete our promised deliverables to full satisfaction due to time constraints and lack of defined leadership structure. We learned important lessons about:

  • Structure: Even small teams benefit from defined leadership and task ownership.
  • Planning: Conservative scoping ensures project deliverables can be met.
  • Fabrication: Early design-for-manufacturing saves time and enables iteration.

Future Work

  • Complete full-scale robotic arch assembly.
  • Fully integrate MoveIt into robotic control stack for autonomous alignment.
  • Refine end-effector precision and truss fabrication for large-scale repeatability.

Additional Information